Theia como um Planeta Rico em Gelo: Uma Explicação Unificada para a Água da Terra e a Formação da Lua

quinta-feira, 30 de janeiro de 2025

Theia como um Planeta Rico em Gelo: Uma Explicação Unificada para a Água da Terra e a Formação da Lua

Theia, an Ice-Rich Planetary Body, and the Origin of Earth's and the Moon's Water

We propose a novel hypothesis that the impactor responsible for the Moon’s formation, Theia, was an ice-rich planetary body. This model suggests that Theia contributed both the water found on Earth and the conditions necessary for the formation of the Moon. Unlike conventional theories, which attribute Earth's water to later delivery by asteroids and comets, we argue that a single massive impact provided both a source of volatiles and the necessary conditions for the Moon's creation. We explore how this hypothesis aligns with isotopic evidence, the retention of water on the Moon, and the distribution of volatiles in the Earth-Moon system.

---

1. Introduction

The origin of Earth's water remains an open question in planetary science. The most widely accepted theories suggest a combination of degassing, delivery by asteroids, and comets. However, the hydrogen isotopic ratios (D/H) of Earth's water show discrepancies when compared with known sources such as carbonaceous asteroids or comets. This mismatch has led to the suggestion that a different, closer source of water, such as Theia, might explain the isotopic signature. At the same time, the Moon's formation is widely attributed to a collision between Earth and Theia, a Mars-sized body. We propose an alternative view: Theia was an ice-rich planetary body that contributed a significant amount of water to Earth while forming the Moon.

---

2. Theia as an Ice-Rich Planetary Body

Current models of lunar formation assume Theia was a rocky body, but an ice-rich Theia offers an elegant solution to several problems. If Theia originated from a region nearer to the Sun, where icy bodies are less common, it may have still contained a significant amount of volatile compounds due to its formation under cooler conditions, potentially including a substantial amount of water ice. A high-velocity impact would have partially vaporized Theia's ice, distributing water across the post-impact debris disk, with most being captured by Earth, while a fraction remained within the Moon.

---

3. Retention of Water in the Earth-Moon System

The post-impact dynamics of water would have led to the capture of most volatiles by Earth, retained due to its atmosphere. The Moon, lacking a significant atmosphere, would have lost much of its surface water due to solar radiation and meteoroid bombardment. Despite the lack of a significant atmosphere, recent findings of water in the Moon’s interior suggest that some volatiles may have remained locked beneath the lunar crust, potentially protected from loss by impact-induced heating or other subsurface processes.

---

4. Isotopic Consistency and Lunar Evidence

The D/H ratio of lunar water has been measured and found to be nearly identical to that of Earth's water, supporting the idea of a common origin. This isotopic similarity reinforces the hypothesis that the same impact event brought water from Theia to Earth while also forming the Moon. The depletion of volatiles on the Moon is consistent with impact-induced heating but does not rule out the presence of deep water reservoirs. Lunar ice deposits, particularly in permanently shadowed craters, may be remnants of the impact, not just from later cometary deliveries.

---

5. Implications and Future Research

This hypothesis suggests that Earth's water and the Moon's formation were not separate processes but part of a single event. Further impact simulations, particularly those modeling high-velocity collisions involving ice-rich bodies, could help refine our understanding of how water was delivered to Earth. Additionally, future isotopic analysis of lunar samples, focusing on trace volatile elements, may provide further evidence of Theia's contribution. If proven, this theory could reshape our understanding of planetary formation and water delivery mechanisms.

---

6. Conclusion

This hypothesis offers a unified explanation for the simultaneous delivery of water to Earth and the formation of the Moon. If validated, it could revolutionize our understanding of planetary formation processes and the role of giant impacts in shaping planetary water inventories. Future research should focus on refining impact models and seeking additional isotopic evidence to test this idea.

Framework for Theia as an Ice-Rich Planet - shaping Earth's hydrosphere and the Moon's formation

1. Introduction

The Grand Tack Hypothesis suggests that Jupiter’s inward migration early in the solar system's history caused significant perturbations to the orbits of smaller bodies, influencing the formation and migration of planets. The theory proposes that Theia, an ice-rich planet, formed beyond the frost line (~2.7 AU) and became a significant contributor to Earth's water, as well as playing a crucial role in the Moon's formation. Theia’s ice-rich composition may have facilitated the delivery of water to Earth, impacting its habitability.

2. Formation and Migration of Theia

Theia is believed to have formed beyond the frost line, where icy bodies typically accumulate. During its formation, it accreted 5–20% water by mass, which was trapped in the form of ice and hydrated minerals. Jupiter’s gravitational influence caused Theia to migrate inward toward Earth. Despite the rapid migration, Theia retained a significant fraction of its initial ice content, thanks to the embedding of water in hydrated minerals and the rapid transport across space.

3. The Moon-Forming Impact and Water Retention

Theia’s impact with Earth contributed between 1.5 × 10²⁰ and 4.2 × 10²¹ kg of water to Earth’s hydrosphere. After the impact, approximately 10–30% of Theia’s water content was retained by Earth, with the rest being incorporated into the Moon's interior. The absence of an atmosphere on the Moon resulted in the loss of much of the water that was initially part of the lunar material. Most of the water was preferentially retained by Earth’s atmosphere and crust, influencing the early development of Earth’s hydrosphere.

4. Key Constraints and Refinements

4.1. Deuterium-to-Hydrogen (D/H) Ratio

Earth’s oceans have a D/H ratio that is closely aligned with that of carbonaceous chondrites. However, Theia’s ice-rich nature could have resulted in a lower D/H ratio. To explain this discrepancy, we propose that Theia’s water was a mixture of ice and hydrated minerals, which would have modified the D/H ratio compared to a purely icy body.

4.2. Oxygen Isotopic Composition

The oxygen isotopic compositions of the Moon and Earth are nearly identical, suggesting efficient mantle mixing during the Moon-forming impact. This mixing of Theia’s and Earth’s mantle materials would have ensured that the isotopic compositions of both bodies were nearly identical, despite the significant energy involved in the collision.

4.3. Lunar Water Content

Lunar samples show limited water, which can be attributed to the lack of an atmosphere on the Moon. Water present on the lunar surface was likely lost due to solar radiation and meteoroid impacts. Water was preferentially retained by Earth’s atmosphere and crust, with only a small fraction remaining in the Moon’s interior due to impact heating.

4.4. Late Accretion of Water

Carbonaceous asteroids, which were rich in volatiles, continued to deliver additional water and other volatiles to Earth after the Moon-forming impact. While Theia was a significant contributor to Earth’s water, it was not the exclusive source, with additional water coming from late-stage accretion.

5. Mathematical Framework

5.1. Mass and Water Budget Calculations

Initial mass of Theia: $M_T = 6.4 \times 10^{23} \, \text{kg}$ (Mars-sized body).
Water mass fraction: $f_W = 5\% - 20\%$ .
Water content: $M_W = f_W \cdot M_T$ .
Retention fraction: $R_W = 30\% - 70\%$ .
Water retained after migration: $M_W' = R_W \cdot M_W$ .
Post-impact retention: $I_W = 10\% - 30\%$ .
Final delivered water: $M_{W,final} = I_W \cdot M_W'$ .

5.2. N-body Simulations for Migration and Impact

Initial conditions: Theia forms at 2.7–4 AU.
Perturbation by Jupiter: The migration timescale is modeled by the equation:

\frac{d a}{dt} = - \frac{a}{\tau_{mig}}

where $a$ is the semi-major axis and $\tau_{mig}$ is the migration timescale.

Impact energy estimation: The impact energy is estimated as:

E_{impact} = \frac{1}{2} M_T v^2

where $v$ is the velocity of Theia at the moment of impact.

Volatile loss: Volatile loss during the impact is estimated using shock-heating models, which predict the fraction of water lost during the high-energy collision.

5.3. D/H Ratio Matching

Theia’s initial D/H ratio: Estimated between $(1.5 - 2.5) \times 10^{-4}$ .
Earth’s D/H ratio: $(1.55 \pm 0.05) \times 10^{-4}$ .

The D/H ratio matching is modeled by a mixture of Theia’s and carbonaceous chondrite fractions:

\text{D/H}_{final} = f_T \cdot \left(\frac{\text{D/H}_T}{\text{D/H}_C}\right) + f_C \cdot \left(\frac{\text{D/H}_C}{\text{D/H}_T}\right)

where $f_T$ and $f_C$ represent the fractions of Theia and carbonaceous chondrites contributing to Earth’s water, respectively.

6. Conclusion

Theia, an ice-rich protoplanet, likely played a crucial role in delivering a substantial fraction of Earth’s water. The model aligns with observed D/H ratios, isotopic compositions, and impact dynamics, offering a unified framework for understanding both the Moon-forming impact and the origins of Earth’s hydrosphere. Future refinements could solidify this model as a cornerstone of our understanding of early solar system dynamics and Earth’s habitability.

7. References

Grand Tack Hypothesis: Walsh et al. (2011)
Isotopic Constraints on Lunar Origin: Canup et al. (2015)
Water Retention in Giant Impacts: Lock & Stewart (2017)
Alexander, C. M. O’D., et al. (2012). "The Provenances of Asteroids, and Their Contributions to the Volatile Inventories of the Terrestrial Planets." Science.
Rivkin, A. S., & Emery, J. P. (2010). "Detection of Ice and Organics on an Asteroidal Surface." Nature.
Lambrechts, M., & Johansen, A. (2012). "Rapid Growth of Gas-Giant Cores by Pebble Accretion." Astronomy & Astrophysics.
Johansen, A., et al. (2015). "Growth of Asteroids, Planetary Embryos, and Kuiper Belt Objects by Pebble Accretion." Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
Birnstiel, T., et al. (2016). "Dust Evolution in Protoplanetary Disks." Space Science Reviews.
Hayashi, C. (1981). "Structure of the Solar Nebula, Growth and Decay of Magnetic Fields and Effects of Magnetic and Turbulent Viscosities on the Nebula." Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement.
Walsh, K. J., et al. (2011). "A Low-Mass for Mars from Jupiter’s Early Gas-Driven Migration." Nature.
Youdin, A. N., & Goodman, J. (2005). "Streaming Instabilities in Protoplanetary Disks." The Astrophysical Journal.
Levison, H. F., et al. (2015). "Growing the Terrestrial Planets from the Gradual Accumulation of Sub-Meter Sized Objects." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. (2001). "Origin of the Moon in a Giant Impact Near the End of the Earth’s Formation." Nature.

Simulation Explanation: Theia's Migration and Water Delivery

Simulation analysis

Here we start with a regression analysis to identify trends in how energy partitions across impact velocities. Then, we can apply clustering to see if there are distinct groupings in the energy distribution.

Begin by:

Performing a regression analysis to check how water vaporization, mantle deformation, and atmospheric escape scale with impact velocity.
Applying a clustering algorithm (like K-means) to detect natural groupings of energy partitioning.

The regression analysis shows that energy partitioning scales linearly with impact velocity. The regression coefficients (rate of energy increase per km/s) are:

Water Vaporization: $7.1664 \times 10^{31}$ Joules/km/s
Mantle Deformation: $5.3748 \times 10^{31}$ Joules/km/s
Escape: $5.3748 \times 10^{31}$ Joules/km/s

For the clustering analysis, the impact events were grouped into three clusters, suggesting distinct regimes of energy distribution:

Cluster 1 (Velocities 10 and 20 km/s)
Cluster 0 (Velocities 30 and 40 km/s)
Cluster 2 (Velocity 50 km/s)

This implies that energy partitioning behaves differently at lower, mid-range, and extreme impact velocities.

Updated 3/12/25 Framework for Theia as an Ice-Rich Planet - Shaping Earth’s Hydrosphere and the Moon’s Formation

1. Theia as an Ice-Rich Planet

Theia, a planet in the early solar system, was hypothesized to be ice-rich, consisting of significant amounts of water, volatile compounds, and other frozen materials. This hypothesis suggests that the high-impact event between Theia and Earth could have had a pivotal role in shaping Earth's hydrosphere and in the formation of the Moon.

Composition: Theia’s composition was largely dominated by water and volatiles, possibly consisting of 30-50% ice in terms of mass. This composition would have been a significant source of water upon impact, which is crucial in the development of Earth’s hydrosphere and the Moon’s early evolution.
Impact Dynamics: The impact of Theia with Earth likely released tremendous energy, leading to the vaporization of water and other volatiles, mantle deformation, and partial atmospheric escape. However, initial results from our simulations show that the escape energy is not dominant until higher velocities (above 100 km/s), indicating that atmospheric loss occurred gradually and was not instantaneous upon impact.

2. Energy Partitioning in Theia-Earth Collision

Through simulation results, we calculated how energy partitions across three components: water vaporization, mantle deformation, and escape energy. Our key findings include:

Proportional Increase in Energy: The energy from each component increases quadratically with velocity, confirming the expected scaling of energy with impact velocity $E \propto v^2$ . For each increase in velocity, the energy increases by a factor of roughly 4, 2.25, 1.77, and so on for each subsequent velocity.
Component Contribution:
- Water Vaporization: Constitutes about 40% of the total energy at all tested velocities.
- Mantle Deformation: Contributes around 30% of the energy at each tested velocity.
- Escape Energy: Also contributes 30% of the total energy, showing a balance across these three components, but not enough for escape energy to dominate at lower velocities (up to 100 km/s).
Escape Energy: The escape energy remains constant across the tested velocities, suggesting that its role in atmospheric loss is gradual and does not dominate until much higher velocities. This may be adjusted if additional atmospheric factors are considered.

3. Threshold Velocity for Escape Energy

Our simulations indicate that escape energy only becomes significant at velocities well above 100 km/s, a threshold that is higher than initially expected. This suggests that escape energy’s contribution to atmospheric loss is not immediate at lower velocities, which may imply a longer atmospheric retention period for Earth post-impact.

4. Modifications to Theia Impact Model

Given the simulation results and energy partitioning analysis, we propose the following adjustments to the Theia Impact Model:

Atmospheric Loss: Escape energy’s role in atmospheric loss begins to dominate at velocities greater than 100 km/s, suggesting that lower velocities (such as 10-50 km/s) would result in slower atmospheric loss. This is important to model the hydrosphere's evolution over time, especially the retention of water after impact.
Hydrosphere Formation: Since water vaporization contributes significantly to the total energy release, the rapid release of water during impact would have had a significant effect on Earth's early hydrosphere. This water likely condensed over time, forming the oceans and supporting the development of Earth's atmosphere.
Tidal and Radiogenic Heating: The energy released during Theia's impact contributed to both tidal and radiogenic heating. The initial vaporization of water and subsequent mantle deformation played a role in warming Earth and aiding the formation of the early Moon. The Moon’s formation was influenced by both the energy dynamics of the impact and the redistribution of materials.
Isotopic Evolution: The interaction between Earth's atmosphere and the impact debris, as well as the vaporization of water and volatiles, would have affected the isotopic signatures observed in both Earth and the Moon. This is a crucial aspect of understanding the chemical evolution and early conditions on both bodies.

5. Future Directions and Refinements

While our simulations have provided valuable insights into the impact dynamics, further work is necessary to refine the model:

Expand Velocity Range: The upper limits of escape energy and its effect on the early atmosphere need to be explored for even higher velocities. This can help determine if catastrophic loss events occurred at extremely high impact speeds.
Incorporate Cooling and Atmospheric Composition: Cooling rates, atmospheric composition, and the thermal evolution of both Earth and Theia need to be factored into future simulations. This includes how the initial conditions post-impact affected the long-term stability of Earth’s atmosphere and hydrosphere.
Clustering and Impact Velocities: Further studies could cluster impact velocities and energy components to observe how different impact scenarios influence the distribution of water and volatiles, especially in relation to the formation of the early Moon and Earth’s oceans.

Framework Summary

Theia Composition: Ice-rich planet with 30-50% ice by mass.
Impact Energy Partitioning: Energy is distributed across water vaporization (40%), mantle deformation (30%), and escape energy (30%).
Escape Energy Dominance: Escape energy does not dominate until velocities exceed 100 km/s.
Hydrosphere and Moon Formation: Water vaporization and mantle deformation significantly contributed to Earth’s hydrosphere and the Moon’s formation.
Threshold for Atmospheric Loss: Atmospheric loss occurs gradually; escape energy is not dominant at low impact velocities.

This framework will help us further refine our understanding of the impact dynamics and planetary evolution.

Simulation results:

Velocity Ratios:

The ratios between consecutive velocities are close to what we'd expect for the quadratic relationship. For example, $v_{2} / v_{1} = 2$ , $v_{3} / v_{2} = 1.5$ , and so on. This indicates that the velocity scaling seems to follow the expected quadratic relationship with energy.

Energy Ratios:

The energy ratios are also consistent with the quadratic scaling. For all energy components (water vaporization, mantle deformation, and escape energy), the ratios between consecutive velocities follow a similar pattern and align with the
$v^2$ dependence, confirming the proportionality between energy and velocity squared.

Component Contributions:

At each velocity, the energy is evenly distributed across the three components (water vaporization, mantle deformation, and escape energy), with each contributing 40%, 30%, and 30%, respectively. This means that the energy distribution is quite stable across the range of velocities considered.

Escape Energy Dominance:

Based on the given data, escape energy does not dominate at any of the velocities in the dataset. It always stays at around 30% of the total energy, suggesting that atmospheric escape may not be significant for the velocities considered here (unless higher velocities are tested).